Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 09:29:57 02/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On February 25, 2001 at 12:18:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 25, 2001 at 11:56:08, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 25, 2001 at 11:04:52, Amicitia Stone wrote: >> >>>This is just the way I see things: >>> >>>Most impressive result: Yace 0.99x 5th place (Wonderful) >>>runner-up: Comet B.31 7th place (Still had 5.0/9 just like Yace) >> >>Very good indeed.... >> >> >>>Most disappointing result: Nimzo 8.0 11th place (What happend?!) >>>runner-up: P. ConNerS 10th place (How many processors does this thing need to >>>win?!) I expected more from it.... >>> >>>The team I feel most happy for: Deep Shredder 5.0 (Congrats!) >>>runner-up: Holmes 0.74 (Nice try! I hope it was a good experience!) >> >>The pattern and story continues.... >> >> >>>The team I feel bad for: Deep Fritz Paderborn (Soooo close! 2nd ain't bad!) >>>runner-up: Nimzo 8.0 (obvious reasons. It wasn't even going to enter the >>>tounament. I bet they regret it.) >> >> >>Same pattern... >> >>Put it into the autoplayer and it wins every long match. > Starting >>slowly but in the end the learner gets the other computer opponent. >> > >I do not see it in the ssdf match against Deep Fritz. Then have a look again. Ed >>Manual tournaments and autoplayer tournaments are different stories. >>Wish it was different and it would give an equal pattern. >> >>Ed > >I think that a bigger book may help for autoplayer tournament because the >program with the bigger book can find after enough games an opening when the >opponent has no good answer to it. > >I think that it may be a good idea to use some fixed positions similiar to the >nunn match for autoplayer games(I do not suggest the nunn match position because >they are known positions and it is better to use positions after 10-15 moves >from grandmasters games). > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.