Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 00:30:12 05/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2001 at 03:03:57, Tony Hedlund wrote: >On May 03, 2001 at 18:41:05, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On May 03, 2001 at 18:37:08, John Dahlem wrote: >> >>>I had for awhile thought HIARCS 7.32 was considered easily the best, but then I >>>read a summary from Cadaques 2000 and it seemed to be thought HIARCS was even >>>somewhat dumb positonally. So, what do you think? HIARCS, Shredder 5, Tiger 14, >>>Junior 6? >> >>According to one test suite: >>http://home.interact.se/~w100107/fentest.htm >> >>These are the top ten: >>AnMon 5.07 AMD K6-2 450 >>SOS AMD K6-2 450 >>Rebel 10b AMD K6-2 450 >>Nimzo 3 P90 >>Rebel Gambit II AMD K6-2 450 >>Rebel Tiger 14 AMD K6-2 450 >>Nimzo 3.5 P90 >>Hiarcs 7.32 AMD K6-2 450 >>Shredder 4 AMD K6-2 450 >>Phalanx XXII AMD K6-2 450 > >You can also check this test: > >http://home.bip.net/gunnar.blomstrand/topplista_64.htm > >This test is from the book "Spiel mit - gegen Grossmeister" by Emil Gelenczei. >64 games which all are judged. 1047 positions in 8 categories were every group >gets 400 points. The idea is to see which program is best in analysing human >games. The time is 40/2 3 min/move. The computer is a Celeron 450 with 128 cache >and 64 MB. > > Program Rating Points >01 Gandalf 4.32f 2617 2120 >02 Fritz 5.0 2591 2099 >03 Gambit Tiger 1 2590 2098 >04 Fritz 6.0 2585 2094 >05 Junior 5.0 2571 2083 >06 Rebel 10 2561 2075 >07 Nimzo 2000 2560 2074 >08 Chess Tiger 13 2540 2058 >09 Zarkov 5.0 2536 2055 >10 Genius 6.5 2529 2049 > >As you can see, the Rebel/Tiger programs is on both lists. > >Tony Very nice Tony. Can these positions be downloaded? Finally something else than tactical positions. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.