Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 09:53:20 11/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2001 at 10:00:00, José Carlos wrote: >On November 18, 2001 at 18:11:04, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>On November 18, 2001 at 17:58:07, Jesper Antonsson wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 2001 at 16:38:12, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >>> >>>>On November 18, 2001 at 12:48:37, Jesper Antonsson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 11:03:39, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 18, 2001 at 04:42:33, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>>>>>>The real gain would be to marry the hardware of D.B. to the software algoritms >>>>>>>of Fritz7 or Chess Tiger IMHO. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yep, that programs with 200 MNPS should be much more stronger than Deep Blue... >>>>> >>>>>Again, that seems like speculation to me. >>>> >>>>Yes it is. >>>> >>>>I think I would win a bet here anyway :) >>> >>>Well, I doubt it, partly because such a Fritz wouldn't be tuned for the speed, >>>partly because I doubt that their eval is better. But, if you wait 10 years or >>>so (hopefully), when you can run at 200 Mnps on a serial machine, and then run >>>new software on that machine, I think *that* machine would be much stronger than >>>DB, for several reasons. :-) >> >>Deep Blue was tuned for its speed, so that is an advantadge for it, but even >>that way, I hope programs of today can still run on that machine and that they >>are tested a lot to convince anyone about any conclusion. Time will tell... let >>stop speculations! :) > > I missed this thread, so maybe someone has already pointed this yet, but I'll >say it anyway: > > 1. This has been discussed here many times. > 2. You can speculate on the strength of Fritz at 200Mnps under some certain >circumstances you should state before speculating, but you can't speculate on >Fritz running on DB hardware. That makes absolutely no sense at all. If Fritz 7 running at 200MNPS were stronger than DB (if that is possible to conclude with DB'logs only) then I would think DB search logic is worse, seems reasonable, and not uninteresting at all. (of course I don't expect Fritz running on DB, who said that?) > The closer >you can get to that concept is "give Frans the same resources the DB team had >and let's see if he can build a stronger machine". DB hardware is not a general >purpose PC. > > José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.