Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:14:13 07/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 19, 2002 at 10:31:09, stuart taylor wrote: >On July 19, 2002 at 10:24:36, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On July 19, 2002 at 09:54:08, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>world championship. >>> >>>I suggest that the rules can say that the games are >>>played under winboard(pondering off,animation off). >>> >>>Every 2 programs can play 100 or even more games between >>>them so the total number of games of every program can be >>>at least 5000. >>> >>>I believe that we may get significant results >>>by that idea. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Somewhat significant, I believe. Even if humans can do something decent in Blitz >>timing, they would not be in any way to comparable to computers if they had only >>1 second per move. But computers can reach a good few plies in that time, and >>play very advanced tactics. No stupid mistakes CAN be made after a whole second. >>S.Taylor >Sorry, I made a mistake! One second per move, I see, was never a question. That >would be great time for anyprogram to do almost anything decent. > But I thought that one second per game meant much more than a second, as any >move can take UP TO a second without being counted as anything at all, and ONE >move is allowed one-to-two seconds. That is how things used to be, I think, if >not now also. >S.Taylor Programs that are designed correctly have no problem to play 1 second per game under winboard without losing on time. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.