Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New and final solution of the Monty Hall Dilemma

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 09:10:53 09/27/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2002 at 11:44:29, Gerrit Reubold wrote:

>On September 27, 2002 at 11:35:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On September 27, 2002 at 11:09:41, Gerrit Reubold wrote:
>>
>>>Perhaps we should play such a game against each other, the one who is right will
>>>get rich, the other will get poor :-)
>>>
>>>Greetings, Gerrit
>>
>>Gerrit, there is no game at all. There is one single trial. Will you be ready to
>>consider now?
>
>A single event is a game, too.
>
>>
>>Rolf Tueschen
>>
>>P.S. In a long serie of many trials, in the end the strategy to always switch is
>>the best, right? But not in the single event. There it's 50:50.
>
>Of course I would be willing to play a game with only a single event. I don't
>understand why you make a difference between probabilities of single events and
>probabilities of events which are in a series of events.
>
>Greetings,
>Gerrit

That is not for making people confused but it's simple maths. Since you asked
for the claimed SSDF relevance, let me explain that I have their technique in
mind when I see people quickly making their simulations. The problem for the
candidate in the game show however has no aspects allowing probability
researches. I think I proved that the take-away of 1 door or 8 cups or 998999
doors diesn't change that after this the two remaining "things" have the same
"probability" namely 1/2. I see also people make typical mistakes in relation to
the apples and beans warning. They argue that the moment the candidate had
chosen a door, then this door is from now on by definition no longer a member of
the doors on the other side. So it has become a "frafra" and then hen the host
is taking away doors on the one side, it's clear that our frafr can't get some
propbability point back like all the other over 900000 doors!Of course this is a
complete delusion.

The same delusion when SSDF is making a ranking list out of different species
individuals. We have 8 modern combinations. With all the stuff involved and we
have embryos and saurians and intelligent sand and whatever. And all play chess
games against each other! And this is accepted because the actual best and
commercialy interesting progs are on the 8 best places. Big surprise, no?!

Rolf Tueschen





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.