Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

Author: Alessandro Damiani

Date: 23:49:05 11/21/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 21, 2002 at 19:17:46, Steffan Westcott wrote:

>On November 21, 2002 at 15:23:55, Alessandro Damiani wrote:
>>On November 21, 2002 at 06:47:24, Steffan Westcott wrote:
>>>On November 21, 2002 at 05:55:59, Alessandro Damiani wrote:
>>>>And for sliding pieces? The distance between the from- and the to-square is not
>>>>fixed. In the worst case, for each to-square there are 7 from-squares for one
>>>>direction. Do you keep one bitboard for each distance in one direction, ordered
>>>>from 1 to 7? Just my first thought.
>>>No, just one bitboard is used to store all possible destination squares for,
>>>say, upward rook moves. Look for my example routines FillUpOccluded(),
>>>FillRightOccluded(), etc in the CCC archives (when they get updated, eventually
>>>:-< ) for a suggestion on how to calculate this type of bitboard quickly.
>>I already understood the concept with "one bitboard for each direction". Let's
>>take a look at the example position I gave in a previous post (here again):
>>[D]4r1k1/2q2pp1/p1p4p/Pp1b4/1P6/2N1PN2/4QPPP/3R2K1 w - - 0 1
>>The bitboard for *all bishops right-down* is:
>>As you said, each time a move is searched, its to-square is removed from the
>>bitboard. We look at the bitboard above as a generic state in the generation
>>process (part of the invariant). By knowing the direction "right-down" we start
>>at the left-up most bit set to 1, right? Do you keep an additional invariant
>>related to the from-square? Or do I like the from-square far too much?? *g*
>Given a bitboard with a single set bit for the move target square and a
>(sliding) move direction, finding the source square of the moving piece is
>simple. Just make an attack bitboard from the target square going in the
>_reverse_ direction (using FillOccludedxxx), then bitwise AND (&) the result
>with the 'AllPieces' bitboard. Put succintly, trace the attack back to its

Ok, I was thinking of an idea without using attack detection again.

This is done for each to-square. I am wondering if this isn't slowing things
down too much. In the worst case the cost is for all moves....


This page took 0.05 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.