Author: Chessfun
Date: 19:42:58 04/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators: >> >> Andrew Williams >> Bruce Moreland >> Charles Worthington >> Chessfun >> Dan Andersson >> Dieter Buerssner >> Kurt Utzinger >> Mike Byrne >> Russell Reagan >> Sally Weltrop >> Slater Wold >> Tony Hedlund >> Uri Blass >> >>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess. >>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters. >>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts. > > > >Actually this is false in some cases. > >Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not >even a good interpreter. Well Rolf you don't have to worry about me as I wouldn't run. But If I had ever run previously and was by some freak of nature elected you wouldn't be posting here. Slater is a good choice, one I voted for once before. >Could it be that a certain age could be of great help for such a job? Or a >certain family status? Meaning the lack of educational experience? > >Surely Bob Hyatt, Tony Hedlund, Ed Schroder, even me, could be highly qualified. Oh indeed you're never "highly aggressive" or "negative at times". >Charles Worthington is really funny as a proposal. I never saw him post before. Guess that would mean you don't frequent this board enough, so maybe it would be better not to run even if nominated. >And to me he sounds strange, when I read Worthington. It is too similar to Robin >Hood... :) > >You see what experience can help you! Yes, since if you'd ever read any of his posts you'd know it was someone totally different. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.