Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:13:06 10/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2003 at 17:06:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 04, 2003 at 16:49:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 04, 2003 at 16:31:13, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>My point is that even with weaker engine I can win in a line that is not the >>>popular line. >> >>Nobody argues that you can't win by playing unpopular lines. What is being >>argued is that playing stupid openings is a bad idea. >> >>-- >>GCP > >Ok >The only question is what is a stupid line. > >I think that winning with 1.h3 is not harder than winning with 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6 >and 1.h3 was mentioned by vincent as an example of a stupid line. > >Uri Though i usually do not answer clowns too much here, i am sure that the white winning chances after 1.e4,c6 2.d4,d6 are quite a bit bigger than after 1.h3 :) Of course a clown like you will now go argue with things like 'proof it'. But please show up at the world champs. I will be delighted to play against 1.h3 and i will be delighted to play with white 1.e4,c6 2.d4,d6 if that's offered to me. However i am very positive that with exception of 1 clown in our middle, the rest of the CCC community will understand the difference between +=/+- versus =+ :) Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.