Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: a question to Tord about detecting threats in null move

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 14:13:06 10/04/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 04, 2003 at 17:06:40, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 04, 2003 at 16:49:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>On October 04, 2003 at 16:31:13, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>My point is that even with weaker engine I can win in a line that is not the
>>>popular line.
>>Nobody argues that you can't win by playing unpopular lines. What is being
>>argued is that playing stupid openings is a bad idea.
>The only question is what is a stupid line.
>I think that winning with 1.h3 is not harder than winning with 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6
>and 1.h3 was mentioned by vincent as an example of a stupid line.

Though i usually do not answer clowns too much here, i am sure that
the white winning chances after

 1.e4,c6 2.d4,d6 are quite a bit bigger than after 1.h3 :)

Of course a clown like you will now go argue with things like 'proof it'.

But please show up at the world champs. I will be delighted to play against 1.h3
and i will be delighted to play with white 1.e4,c6 2.d4,d6 if that's offered to

However i am very positive that with exception of 1 clown in our middle, the
rest of the CCC community will understand the difference between
+=/+- versus =+  :)

Best regards,

This page took 0.12 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.