Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:38:59 01/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2004 at 17:11:08, John Paul Jones wrote: >On January 15, 2004 at 14:57:01, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On January 15, 2004 at 11:30:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On January 15, 2004 at 06:17:38, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>You have improved DeepSjeng much in kingsideattacks. That´s are really good >>>>news. >>>> >>>>But you know there is a lot to do to play good attackingchess. >>>> >>>>Maybe i should post another position by Kasaparov? >>> >>>Should this turn into a kasparov did this well, kasparov blundered here >>>type of "war"? >> >>Noooo!!!!! pleeeeease no war !!! >> >>> >>>In response to your position, I'll offer game 2 in the DB 1997 match, >>>where kasparov blundered and resigned in a drawn position. My program >>>won't resign there. Does that make it better than Kasparov? That kind >>>of logic is simply flawed. >> >>Sorry, but i don´t like this kind of simple logic. >> >>> >>>Kasparov (and all other GM players) have played more than their share of >>>blunders to go along with the brilliancies. I don't think that just because >>>a program will (or won't) play the same move says much about who is better. >>>Single moves don't mean a lot. Complete games do. >> >>Yes!!!, and as we know he is the highest rated player in the world, which means >>that a has the most wins against the best players of the world. Do you believe >>that your program can do it as well as Kasparov it did? > > >Crafty would not stand a prayer in anything longer then game in 15 I would not be surprised if it _won_ at anything under game/30. And at longer time controls it is _not_ easy to beat it there... There's plenty of evidence. It has played GMs at long time controls more than once...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.