Author: Mark Young
Date: 06:02:05 01/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2004 at 04:07:06, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > > > A played a match of 22 games between Shredder 8 and Fritz 5.32 with the >following results > > Time control: 15' Ponder=off Powerbook2004 with maximun variety of play, >learn=off, Hash=64 mb > > I know these are too little games to extract any conclusion, but i think this >must have some meaning. > > >PABLO-ILFE1CXZX, Blitz:15' 0 > > 1234567890123456789012 >1 Shredder 8 11111½½1111½111½1111½1 19.5/22 +17/-0/=5 88.64% +356 elo dif >2 Fritz 5.32 00000½½0000½000½0000½0 2.5/22 +0/-17/=5 11.36% > > > > Well, i was feeling some curiosity about the result of a match like this would >be and that's why i did it. I remember back in 1999 Fritz 5.32 played in >Hannover 2 games against Kasparov with 15' each, and tie the match with 2 draws. > > It is not difficult to guess that, given the above result, Shredder 8 is much >stronger than Kasparov himself at 15' blitz. If Shredder 8 is able to score 99% >against most of humans, i don't think it finds much trouble getting 80%, maybe >more against a supergm (+2700 fide elo) at this time control. What do you think >about this? > > And of course, here are the games Computer programs are stronger then any human at fast time controls. We have many results on ICC to back up this claim. I have seen very strong GM Players lose 10 or 20 or more games in a row to programs like Shredder, Hiarcs, Crafty... It is rare to see a draw, and even more so to see the human win. I can't remember seeing a GM win on ICC, when I have been watching in a very long time. This is not to hard to understand. Super GM's have only been able to draw their matches to programs at standard time controls. ( Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs) > >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.