Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCC Elections: a difficult choice

Author: Pete Galati

Date: 08:21:27 08/10/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 10, 2000 at 08:56:43, Aaron Tay wrote:

>On August 09, 2000 at 16:03:39, Pete Galati wrote:
>
>>On August 09, 2000 at 06:04:14, Aaron Tay wrote:
>
>>>But wouldn't "high profile" people be involved in most of the conversation
>>>threads? Makes it difficult for them to moderate as there's a conflict of
>>>interest..
>
>>>One thing the 3 mentioned avoe have in common, ( Robert Hyatt, Dann Corbit, >>and Mogens Larsen ) is that i think (i could be very wrong) they have strong
>>>opinions in common? about crafty and other matters  ..
>
>
>>>And we know how much of CCC posts are taken up by posts regarding almost every
>>>aspect of Crafty espically, those comparing it to commericals..
>
>>Good.  People who are involved would be better moderators if you ask me.
>
>Well..I disagree..People no matter how level headed they are, get into a lot of
>trouble when they are personally involved..

Or what is interpreted as trouble, that depends on your perspective.

>
>Anyway, Dr Hyatt himself is currently keeping a low profile because of some
>disagreements with some Moderator who intervened in a thread that he (the
>moderator) was involved in..
>
>I hope I'm not misrepresenting his views, but basically he feels that a
>moderator shouldn't intervene in a thread he is participating in..

Keep in mind how many threads he never did touch.  There are all sorts of
subjects that he never posts a reply to.

>
>As such, it would mean that if he was a Moderator he probably would have
>problems justifying intervening in  debates over Crafty threads, or matters
>regarding deep blue for that matter..
>
[......]

Good.  People need to start taking care of themselves anyhow.  If he is involved
in a thread (same for the other moderators) and feel he now can't delete
something in it, then good.

It completely baffles me that people think that this place should be some sort
of perfect world in here, and that there should be no conflict, and no insults
whatsoever.  Everything should be peachy all the time, is that it?  I don't
think so.  People have to stand up, take a stand, protect yourself, protect
others.  Why should the moderator do your work for you?  I don't want the
moderator doing the work for me.  I don't want the moderator deleting a post
before I get a chance to read it, and I also don't want him having any say about
what I should be able to read or post here.

It sounds to me like you want the moderators to not be involved so that they
will be free to take things away from you.  But I want moderators not to
moderate as much.  I'm sick & tired of this place being one big padded cell.
The place more or less proves that the moderated forum concept doesn't work all
that well.

Pete



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.