Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:24:51 09/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2000 at 14:54:23, Uri Blass wrote: >I do not see a reason that you think that paying money for the programmer is >right when paying for a beta teter that I see as part of the team behind the >chess program (assuming that the information of the beta tester was productive >to improve the program) is not right. I'm not interested in paying money for the programmer :o). You're already getting paid indirectly be being a betatester as you don't have to buy the program you're testing. That is more than sufficient payment IMHO and that goes for most people I think. Unless you think you're something special when it comes to chess software, or the Universe in general. When I buy a program from someone I don't keep on paying the software company, nor do they have to continue paying me when they've already given me the program. It's a simple transaction; something for something, not fulltime employment, house payments, hungry children, expensive wife and regular work hours. Mogens.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.