Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: OT:Re: chessbase

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 05:20:06 03/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On March 25, 2001 at 06:09:54, Peter Berger wrote:

>I was simply making a sneaky remark about the following lines :
>
>"Chessbase provides the best chess engines at a very affordable price.
>Chessbase provides the best interface for chess engines.
>Chessbase is the standard by which all others are judged."
>
>These like similar statements make me wonder if this is some kind of religion .

right. sounds really much like scientologists. freaky fanatics. who have lost
their capability to think themselves and instead create statements like the one
above. right.

>I own a few Chessbase programs and I like them ; I own some others , too , which
>are also fine .

right. but i see a tendency and i do not like this tendency
because i know this development from other
parts of my life: the variety decreases, the poor mass products increase,
and instead to repair your watch you throw it away and buy another one.

>I am not especially in favour of a situation where there is only one interface
>left so I am not too happy with a Chessbase/Tiger but this is only an opinion .

right. but you have to see that for some people the concept of capitalism is a
holy thing and it is not allowe to critisize holy things.
for them it is one main dogma of them, and saying something against it is
a problem for them.


>Statements like the above keep getting repeated several times by several users
>until probably they get accepted as the simple truth .

:-)))

>This is like Mr Irazoquoi claiming that Chessbase programs have been leading
>everybody's list for 3 years now forgetting about CM6000, Hiarcs 7 and Tiger 12.

do you really he is believing the lies he spreads arround ?
i cannot believe that he is so ... to believe what he says and spreads.
maybe it is his job to praise the lord of chessbase in this
way. don't forget that he is a writer for computerschach and spiele.
he is so deeply involved in all this development, that he cannot judge the
things in a balanced way IMO.


>Statement 1 : Best prices ? I think the Rebel 11 package or CM8000 have much
>more reasonable prices .


absolutely correct.


>Also I am not in favour of this selling of things like
>"Fritz Endgame Turbo" which every user can build for him/herself .

right. making money out of something you get for free. this is exploit the
concept of somebody else.

>Statement 2: Is this about the GUI ? Well , the GUI is fine . CM8000 and
>ChessPartner or Shredder are fine , too . Every interface contains a few things
>the others don't have . It's also obvious that the different companies learn
>from each other and these functions are usually in the next version of the other
>company , too , which is great for us users .

right.

>Statement 3 : Hmm , can't comment on this .

:-)))


>pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.