Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 09:22:08 03/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2001 at 12:18:26, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On March 29, 2001 at 11:27:23, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > > >>32... g5 {-0.78/17 7200} 33. f5 {-1.19/16 120:00m} * >> >>[D] rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>Shredder played the move expected by Deep Fritz: 33.f5 >>Shredders evaluation dropped from -0.48/16 to -1.19/16 ?! >> >>Shredder now expecting 33...Rxf5 34. Re3 >> >>Next move by Deep Fritz on Friday >> >>Venlig hilsen >>Hans Christian Lykke > >In this situation I wonder: are you keeping a strict 2h/move? Or do you >let Shredder look at all moves at the depth? > >If you terminate the search after exactly 2h and don't let shredder finish >an iteration I think this game isn't particularly interesting. This is >not even close to how a program would allocate time in a real game. > >Ralf Looks very close to a fixed time per move I think. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.