Author: Ralf Elvsén
Date: 09:18:26 03/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2001 at 11:27:23, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>32... g5 {-0.78/17 7200} 33. f5 {-1.19/16 120:00m} *
>
>[D] rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
>
>Shredder played the move expected by Deep Fritz: 33.f5
>Shredders evaluation dropped from -0.48/16 to -1.19/16 ?!
>
>Shredder now expecting 33...Rxf5 34. Re3
>
>Next move by Deep Fritz on Friday
>
>Venlig hilsen
>Hans Christian Lykke
In this situation I wonder: are you keeping a strict 2h/move? Or do you
let Shredder look at all moves at the depth?
If you terminate the search after exactly 2h and don't let shredder finish
an iteration I think this game isn't particularly interesting. This is
not even close to how a program would allocate time in a real game.
Ralf
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.