Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:15:30 08/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 07:06:51, Uri Blass wrote: >Here are the results by >elostat program > >You can see that shredder is only 3th place micro based on the performance. >Shredder is the world Micro champion by definition but Tiger and Rebel had a >better performance. > > >1 Deep Junior 7 : 2745 228 281 9 88.9 % 2384 22.2 % >2 Quest (DeepFritz) : 2550 266 169 9 66.7 % 2430 44.4 % >3 Chess Tiger 14.6 Gambit Tiger : 2499 291 229 9 55.6 % 2461 22.2 % >4 Crafty 18.10X : 2467 291 165 9 55.6 % 2428 44.4 % >5 Rebel : 2466 291 229 9 55.6 % 2428 22.2 % >6 Shredder : 2466 266 249 9 66.7 % 2346 22.2 % >7 Goliath : 2421 291 165 9 55.6 % 2382 44.4 % >8 Gromit 3.9.5 : 2364 278 201 9 61.1 % 2285 33.3 % >9 Ferret : 2359 291 229 9 55.6 % 2320 22.2 >%10 Gandalf 5.0 : 2310 291 229 9 55.6 % 2271 22.2 >% >11 ParSOS : 2256 291 229 9 55.6 % 2217 22.2 % >12 Diep : 2227 165 291 9 44.4 % 2265 44.4 % >13 IsiChess X : 2166 201 278 9 38.9 % 2245 33.3 % >14 Tao : 2165 229 291 9 44.4 % 2203 22.2 % >15 Ruy Lopez : 2118 366 266 9 33.3 % 2238 0.0 % >16 Pharaon : 2082 169 266 9 33.3 % 2202 44.4 % >17 SpiderGirl : 2014 213 255 9 27.8 % 2180 33.3 % >18 XiNiX : 1724 400 108 9 5.6 % 2216 11.1 % > >congratulation also for the Deep Junior team for winning the event convincingly >when the difference from the second place is almost 200 elo and the hardware >explain less than 70 elo difference. > >Uri I can add that I think that it may be a better idea to use elostat to decide about the world champion in the future. I know that a lot of people are going to disagree but it is my opinion. I prefer a complicated method that does more justive and not a simple method. Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.