Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: [MODERATION] This is just an attack.. no proof at all...

Author: Chessfun

Date: 04:25:33 03/06/04

Go up one level in this thread


On March 06, 2004 at 07:17:58, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On March 06, 2004 at 06:49:37, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>I have recently asked you in reply to your posts numerous questions about
>>"computerchess" you choose to ignore those questions.
>
>
>mainly it is me posting PGN data and you pissing on it :-)

I am still waiting for the PGN, why it takes weeks for one single game is
anyones guess. And please post a link where I said anything bad about what you'd
posted on the CSTal Shredder 8 game? Still waiting for a PGN for weeks that
you'd said you'd post makes it clear you have little interest in "computerchess"

>or you and your friends posting PGN data of blitz games, that make IMO not much
>sense other then beeing propaganda for chess base, especially when they are done
>5' blitz on 500 mhz machines.

First if "I" posted 5 min blitz games they would be on a AMD 2600 XP. And fact
is mostly I play either 40/40 or 60' 3".

I posted 100 40/40 games how about those?
http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=348213

>if you post data with sensible and senseful time control i do read and i will
>not ignore it. i will say "thank you" and study the material

Still waiting for a reply to the 100 40/40 games.
http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?352067

See, seems I can stick to on topic stuff. As for you well the last paragraph you
wrote that I removed, says it all.

Sarah.




This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.