Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 06:53:31 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 03:56:57, Sune Fischer wrote: >On February 19, 2005 at 03:41:05, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On February 18, 2005 at 18:52:58, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>These assumptions are absolutely wrong. It is a common problem in this Forum of >>>asserting things that I have not said. >>> >>>"Look the answer: 30% of the total score reached by Diep in testings and 25% of >>>the total score reached by Zappa in private tests. The books was responsible of >>>30% and 25% of the score reached for every mentioned engine. >>>I'm not quite sure what that means actually." >>> >>>Example: If Diep played 10 games, and it won 10 games, 3 games were because of >>>the book. Do you understand? A direct win because of the book. >> >>I'm just explaining that you can't translate that to an Elo number without >>knowing how many games there were in total. > >Correction, it's not the number of games that's important, it's the percentage. > >Let's assume you played equal opponents so the score went from 45% to 65%. > >This would give about 140 Elo. > >-S. I repeated twice my explanation, if you dont understand it. It is not my problem. AO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.