Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 07:28:52 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 09:53:31, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >On February 19, 2005 at 03:56:57, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>On February 19, 2005 at 03:41:05, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On February 18, 2005 at 18:52:58, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>These assumptions are absolutely wrong. It is a common problem in this Forum of >>>>asserting things that I have not said. >>>> >>>>"Look the answer: 30% of the total score reached by Diep in testings and 25% of >>>>the total score reached by Zappa in private tests. The books was responsible of >>>>30% and 25% of the score reached for every mentioned engine. >>>>I'm not quite sure what that means actually." >>>> >>>>Example: If Diep played 10 games, and it won 10 games, 3 games were because of >>>>the book. Do you understand? A direct win because of the book. >>> >>>I'm just explaining that you can't translate that to an Elo number without >>>knowing how many games there were in total. >> >>Correction, it's not the number of games that's important, it's the percentage. >> >>Let's assume you played equal opponents so the score went from 45% to 65%. >> >>This would give about 140 Elo. >> >>-S. > > >I repeated twice my explanation, if you dont understand it. It is not my >problem. You don't want to tell me your results that's fine, but I hope you realize that claiming 10 of 10 is nonsense. -S. >AO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.