Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:22:16 12/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 1999 at 22:11:00, Len Eisner wrote:
>The older programs on the SSDF list are underrated and the newer ones are
>overrated. Why is that?
>
>Bob Hyatt's view is that the best of the current programs are about 2450. That
>is at least 200 points less than their SSDF ratings.
>
>The older programs seem to be underrated by about as much as the new ones are
>overrated. For example, the Fidelity Mach IV is only rated 2074 when it should
>be over 2250. The old Novag Super Constellation is only 1731. I know it was at
>least 200 points stronger than that.
>
>Len
What are your arguments to support this statement?
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.