Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: WMCCC - may the best man at getting the fastest hardware win :(

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:02:23 10/22/97

Go up one level in this thread

On October 22, 1997 at 13:11:19, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On October 22, 1997 at 09:27:59, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>I've also asked this before, but no answer.  I'll ask again:  "how fast
>>is not too fast".  IE what is the maximum allowable mhz you'd want to
>>Why is a PII/300 not an issue when it is significantly faster than a
>>why is a 500 (or 766mhz) alpha a problem, when my 500 mhz machine is
>>probably not even 1.5x the PII/300?
>>Again, "how fast is too fast"???
>To save Chris the trouble, I think he would argue that any machine you
>bring that is faster than the tournament machine, is too fast.
>I mentioned a P5/60 vs a 486/66, which was the "fast" machine vs the
>"standard" machine in 1993, and he said this was unfair, too.

I don't agree, because he said that the P5/133 vs P5/120 was O.K.  and
that the PII/300 vs the AMD K6/233 was "ok".  But a 500mhz alpha (my
vs the AMD is "not ok."  I was looking for quantification of what
"ok" means...

This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.