Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:05:58 05/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2000 at 11:03:13, Christophe Theron wrote: >On May 21, 2000 at 10:17:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 21, 2000 at 00:04:16, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On May 20, 2000 at 21:25:20, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>> >>>>On May 19, 2000 at 19:25:47, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 19, 2000 at 13:17:39, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 19, 2000 at 13:13:22, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 19, 2000 at 09:46:04, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On May 19, 2000 at 09:36:01, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On May 19, 2000 at 03:44:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On May 18, 2000 at 22:47:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>SMP computers _are_ mainstream. In another 3-5 years, every microprocessor will >>>>>>>>>>>likely have two cpus on one die. But for today, Asus, AMI, several others, are >>>>>>>>>>>all selling dual cpu machines like hotcakes. Not as many as the basic single- >>>>>>>>>>>cpu machine, of course. But tens of thousands are being built/sold daily by >>>>>>>>>>>a couple of pretty good companies. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Very limited use. Most people don't want/don't need/will never own one. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>5 years ago, most people would never have thought they'd want/need/or own even >>>>>>>>>something like a 500MHz machine, either, let alone something like 1GHz. :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In 1992, a dealer in Holland gave me a strong advise against buying a 486/33, >>>>>>>>because only an engineer would need such as monstruous machine. :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Enrique >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You all miss the point. >>>>>> >>>>>>Such is the fate of us, mortals. >>>>>> >>>>>>Which point? :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Enrique >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>The "PC" is a dead concept. Time to move on. >>>> >>>>Move on to where though? >>>> >>>>I don't think the PC is going to die anytime real soon, but I see other forms of >>>>computing becoming more popular. >>> >>> >>> >>>That's what I mean. >>> >>> >>> Christophe >>> >>> >> >>When I use the term "PC" I include desktops, laptops, palm devices, etc. The >>"form factor" doesn't count for much. In fact, I use my trusty laptop more than >>I do any desktop. If a palm had a good cpu, and reasonable input interface, I >>might use one of those more than my laptop. >> >>I don't think a 'centralized computing system' will happen again. > > > >OK, so you can understand that I don't think that all these devices will be SMP >soon. > >SMP is okay for a big PC on a desk or for a network server, but for other >devices, which will become more and more common, it's useless. > >Instead of stuffing several processors into a machine that is used for word >processing only, I think it would be smarter to work on making the screen more >readable, the computer smaller (so it takes less space on the desk), maybe even >transportable, and so on... > >For the same cost, the idea is to have computers easier to use. Having more >computing power is now futile for most applications. > > > Christophe You are missing my point. Within 5 years, a single microprocessor chip is going to have more than one cpu. There are already prototypes. Several vendors have done this already, although none that are "PC" aware... But a dual or quad cpu chip is coming. Quicker than you might think. And it will still be able to run in a palm or whatever, if the computational demands continue to increase..
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.