Author: william penn
Date: 14:43:08 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 17:33:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 17:16:31, william penn wrote: > >>On May 21, 2001 at 16:12:11, Rajen Gupta wrote: >> >>>cm 8000 is getting clobbered day in and day out! as i remeber (remind me if i'm >>>wrong) cm 6000 more than held its own against fritz5.32 junior 5 and nimzo 7.32. >>>and was in fact rated a point or 2 higher than either if them. >>> >>>this one is behaving more like a vintage cm 3000 (performance wise) >>> >>>a real sheep in wolf's clothing i must say >>> >>>rajen >> >> All those people who were looking for evidence for my statement that 6555 is >>stronger than 8000, they seem to have suddenly vanished. lol > >Wouldn't it be funny, if the binary were -- for all intents and purposes -- >identical? > >Supposing there *is* a 50 ELO difference between the two programs... >It is almost impossible to prove it. > >Every swing in fortune in a SSDF set brings oohs and aahs of either doom and >destruction or meteoric rise if it should be shifted to one opponent or the >other. > >I suspect it would be good to wait until the whole set is in. i don't know mr. corbitt, it seems that a little common sense along with basic observation and experience using cm8000 as oppose to cm60000 shows the former to be much weaker. i don't think that i have seen a good cm8000 result since it has been released. i have played many games against 6000 and have yet to win a single game, i have already beaten 8000 twice and drew it once. i am not out to defame the program author at all, i have always been a fan of cm . if i state what i believe to be the truth, based on observation and experience, if this is seen as a smear on someone's program , then so be it.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.