Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 10:41:43 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 10:33:09, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On July 07, 2002 at 10:15:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >No Thomas, you are the one who is wrong. Adams himself has >explained that 21 ... d5? is a mistake. Here I quote Adams' >view on this move in NIC magazine 2002, no. 3: > >21 ... d5?! > >'This move shows a lack of experience with this variation. >In these lines d5 is often a dangerous move to play, as >white's pieces become very active. Better was either 21 ... a5 >or 21 ... Rc8 22 Bb3 Bd7 23 Qf3 Be6 shoring up the sensitive >a2-g8 diagonal, as in Topalov-Ivanchuk, Monaco 2001 blind'. > >To your move 23 ... Qd7 Adams states: '24 Qh5 is similar to the >game'. He says that 23 ... Qd6 was worth considering. > >So it is not Alex trying to impress people, but he just does >know Adams' analysis. Like I do :-) > >Jeroen Hi Jeroen, maye tricky Micky would analyse his position ones again if he have to play it against shredder? After the above mainvariation it looks like a draw: 18 140:55 +0.77 24.Dh5 Dc7 25.Tad1 Tad8 26.Txd8 Txd8 27.Dxe5 Dxe5 28.Txe5 g6 29.Te2 h5 30.a3 Lg7 31.c4 Td3 32.cxb5 Things are in chess often not so clear. Greetings Thomas >>I think Alexander Kure is wrong.Ponarmarjov would for shure play 23...Qd7 with a >>equal position.For example 24.Qg6 Bd5 25.Qd3 Bc6 = >> >>It lools like Alexander likes to impress people. >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.