Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Verified Null-Move Pruning, ICGA 25(3)

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 14:43:13 11/22/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 22, 2002 at 17:29:35, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On November 22, 2002 at 07:26:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>I expect it to do better at longer times too of course, for the reason
>>pointed out in this thread than it becomes more comparable to R=3. R=3 is
>>superior in Deep Sjeng compared to verified R=3, so as verified gets
>>closer to R=3, it will do better, but I don't expect it to do
>>"better than R=3".
>>I have different testing priorities right now because in any case it
>>looks vastly inferior to what I am doing now (not R=3 and not R=2/3).
>What are you doing now?

Ultra-Secret-Commercial-Hyper-Mega-Pruning-Technique XBHY-356



This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.