Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Sjeng Opteron Performance Results

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 02:55:13 08/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2003 at 05:30:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>>The Opteron was tested in SPEC. For their entire set of programs (also
>>non-chess and hence non-bitboarders), the Opteron is clock for clock 55%
>>faster than the Athlon XP.
>
>...and it's 74% faster clock for clock than the P4.
>
>For Crafty, the Opteron is 65% faster clock for clock than the Athlon XP.
>It's 165% (!!) faster clock for clock than the Pentium 4.
>(All from SPEC data)
>
>                Opteron v Athlon       Opteron vs P4
>SPEC                  1.55                   1.74
>Crafty                1.65                   2.65
>Sjeng                 1.70                   2.05
>
>Crafty gets 7% more speedup on the Opteron compared to the average program,
>and Sjeng gets 10% more speedup compared to the average program.
>
>Based on this, it looks to me like the speedups are much more due to the
>improved architecture (more registers, insanely fast latency, better branch
>prediction, larger caches) than the 32 bit vs 64 bit difference. Crafty
>definetely has more 64 bit arithmethic than I do.

65% is disappointing for Crafty. It should get the 65% from register and cache
like all other programs, plus whatever speedup the bitboards get.

Not easy to optimize for new architecture without having access to the machine,
but I'd be _very_ surprised if a non-bitboarder turns out to be faster, it must
indicate a problem of some sort.

Perhaps there is a bottleneck after all, Crafty has a ton of tables, many of
those could be generated on the fly. Could it really be trashing the large
cache?
I should be interesting to compare with e.g. gnuchess or some other bitboard
prog though.

>When running 32 bit software (or more precisely, software using the old 8
>register instruction set), the Opteron is 42% and 65% faster than the Athlon
>and P4 respectively.
>
>This means that, even when running NOT optimized software, a 2.0Ghz Opteron
>is _still_ FASTER THAN ANY ATHLON XP OR PENTIUM 4 ON THE MARKET.

You seem surprised? ;)

>--
>GCP



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.