Author: Chesster Fritz
Date: 05:37:04 01/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2004 at 04:47:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On January 13, 2004 at 19:05:23, Chesster Fritz wrote: > >>On January 13, 2004 at 14:31:38, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On January 13, 2004 at 10:59:52, Steve Maughan wrote: >>> >>>>Martin, >>>> >>>>>translated this means about this: "fritz and shredder played the best chess in >>>>>this tournament (he is comparing against junior and brutus), and won their >>>>>games against the outsiders most easily" - i don't really mind the first part >>>>>of this sentence, but the second part is really hilarious given the shredder- >>>>>jonny incident! >>>> >>>>I don't really want to start up the whole Graz scandle thread but in the Jonny >>>>game Shredder was easily winning. >>> >>>Pardon me, you mean easily winning? And why SHREDDER didn't win (easily)? Why >>>had it won with the aid of someone who threw a whole game although it was a >>>draw? Could you explain your position? If you are a chessplayer yourself, could >>>you reflect your position in relation to possible cases of a PATT or THREEFOLD? >>>Would you dare to say that such draws are not existing because they are most >>>unfair to the side which has a won game???? >>> >>>Do you mean that if you call something a "bug", that then this is like >>>'unimportant' or 'non-existent'? >>> >>>So, if I allow a draw by a PATT for instance, that then I couzld say that I had >>>a bug and then I would still be judged as an extremely strong player? And my >>>opponents would throw their game just to let me wi??? Where is this being >>>played. Please tell me exact address. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>The scandle occured due to a bug in Shredder. >>>> So if SMK is commenting on the general quality of chess played by the programs >>>>(which he seems to be) I don't really have a problem and I think he's correct. >>>> >>> >>>The "general" quality of the chess is something SMK is completely impotent to >>>judge. SMK has no chess master status whatsoever. Probably he's a good >>>businessman as Daniel pointed out, but his thought process is really biased >>>heavily. Please do not speak of chess in general if you talk about the actual >>>computerchess with BOOKS and TABLES, which is cheating after the FIDE Laws. >>> >>>Rolf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>Steve >> >> >>BTW SMK is a certified Chess Master. > >Pure fantasy! He's not a master, of course. > >Rolf > He's rated at 2250 or thereabouts. What you have to say on the matter is of no consequence. I stated a fact, no amount of smoke from you will obscure that fact. I notice you have a problem taking in information. This must have been enormously frustrating for your teachers, when you were a child. It's a pity you have such a learning disability. Fritz > > >>Again you're just blowing smoke. >> >>The only impotence I see is your addle-minded ramblings. >> >>Fritz
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.