Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 08:19:04 02/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi On February 27, 2000 at 00:15:14, Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) wrote: >I noticed today that six of the seven chess programs that I tried >(three freeware, four commercial) failed to pass the two tests below. > >(my congratulations to Will Bryant, who programmed Screamer right!) > >The others don't understand how castling rights and en passant capture >rights effect the ability to claim draw by three-fold repetition of position. > >The FIDE Laws of Chess (1997, but unchanged from when I learned chess 26 years >ago) say: [snip] >#1 Check for knowledge of castling rights on triple repetition draw = > >1. Nf3 Nf6 >2. Rg1 Rg8 >3. Rh1 Rh8 (second occurrence of this visible piece pattern, but first >occurrence w/o castling rights) >4. Rg1 Rg8 >5. Rh1 Rh8 ( No draw, yet - this is the original piece pattern, but there > both sides had castling rights. To put it another way, the EPD > strings for the starting position and this one are different.) >6. Rg1 Rg8 - draw by triple repetition of position. > >#2 Check for knowledge of en passant opportunity of triple repetition draw = > >1. a4 a6 >2. a5 b4 >3. Nf3 Nf6 >4. Ng1 Ng8 (second occurrence of this visible piece pattern, but first >occurrence w/o en passant capture option) >5. Nf3 Nf6 >6. Ng1 Ng8 (again, no draw yet - there is no en passant capture possible here, > as there was after Black's second move). >7. Nf3 - draw by triple repetition of position. >Which chess programs (other than Screamer) get these right? Not that anyone cares, but my engine gets these right. :) But only if blacks 2nd move in the 2nd mini-game is b5. (instead of b4) Kind regards, -sargon
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.