Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 21:19:57 07/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2000 at 15:40:21, Chris Whittington wrote: >On July 01, 2000 at 15:09:47, Steffen Jakob wrote: > >>Hi Chris! >> >>>Why don't you just fix the board software to count reads and display them in the >>>title field? Just as if they were beans. >>> >>>Then the evidence to declare on or off-topic would have objectivity. >>> >>>I'm sure the moderators then have enough non-Artificial Intelligence to >>>interpret the bean counts before jumping into contentious actions. >> >>The filter at the moment supports "thread", "author" and "date". It would be >>nice to have "number of accesses", too. >> >>Greetings, >>Steffen. > >I think this won't happen. It's an obviously good idea. > >But. > >Moderators, potential moderators and those who work behind the scenes here to >control things want to be quite free to interpret posts and threads and posters >their own way. > >A readcount contstrains their freedom to act arbitrarily. > >That's one reason why my posts got no comments from any moderators or 'senior' >programmers. > >Even technical solutions are political, you see. > >I think forget this place. It is beyond redemption. > >Chris Whittington A hit counter on each post would produce data that would be interesting, but wouldn't support any conclusions other than that people are reading some stuff and not reading some other stuff. It doesn't say anything about why they are reading it or whether they are bothered about the topicality of what they read. We have people moderate for six months at a time. They are voted in and they get to run the show. If they want to try to be strict about off-topic stuff, fine, although if they get too strict they might get some backlash from group members, which seems like a fine feedback mechanism to me. bruce
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.