Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderate Bean Counting

Author: blass uri

Date: 00:21:57 07/02/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 02, 2000 at 00:19:57, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On July 01, 2000 at 15:40:21, Chris Whittington wrote:
>
>>On July 01, 2000 at 15:09:47, Steffen Jakob wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Chris!
>>>
>>>>Why don't you just fix the board software to count reads and display them in the
>>>>title field? Just as if they were beans.
>>>>
>>>>Then the evidence to declare on or off-topic would have objectivity.
>>>>
>>>>I'm sure the moderators then have enough non-Artificial Intelligence to
>>>>interpret the bean counts before jumping into contentious actions.
>>>
>>>The filter at the moment supports "thread", "author" and "date". It would be
>>>nice to have "number of accesses", too.
>>>
>>>Greetings,
>>>Steffen.
>>
>>I think this won't happen. It's an obviously good idea.
>>
>>But.
>>
>>Moderators, potential moderators and those who work behind the scenes here to
>>control things want to be quite free to interpret posts and threads and posters
>>their own way.
>>
>>A readcount contstrains their freedom to act arbitrarily.
>>
>>That's one reason why my posts got no comments from any moderators or 'senior'
>>programmers.
>>
>>Even technical solutions are political, you see.
>>
>>I think forget this place. It is beyond redemption.
>>
>>Chris Whittington
>
>A hit counter on each post would produce data that would be interesting, but
>wouldn't support any conclusions other than that people are reading some stuff
>and not reading some other stuff.  It doesn't say anything about why they are
>reading it or whether they are bothered about the topicality of what they read.
>
>We have people moderate for six months at a time.  They are voted in and they
>get to run the show.  If they want to try to be strict about off-topic stuff,
>fine, although if they get too strict they might get some backlash from group
>members, which seems like a fine feedback mechanism to me.
>
>bruce

The meaning of on topic is not clearly defined and there are cases when the
moderators can know that people may disagree about the question if something is
on topic(for example books on C++).

I think that in this case read count can help to decide if the subject is on
topic.

Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.