Author: Pete Galati
Date: 13:03:39 08/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2000 at 06:04:14, Aaron Tay wrote: >On August 09, 2000 at 05:14:20, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>>I think by popular, P.Skinner is really referring to "high profile" or perhaps >>>"active" which would be a poor reason to choose someone to settle differences. >>>All of the other candidates would do a good job. I have confidence that the CCC >>>readers won't have some sort of brain seizure and ask me to do it. >> >>Yes, I was guessing that by popular, meaning "high profile" people. I saw the >>response that Robert got for not posting here for a while... pretty impressive. > >But wouldn't "high profile" people be involved in most of the conversation >threads? Makes it difficult for them to moderate as there's a conflict of >interest.. > >One thing the 3 mentioned avoe have in common, ( Robert Hyatt, Dann Corbit, and >Mogens Larsen ) is that i think (i could be very wrong) they have strong >opinions in common? about crafty and other matters .. > >And we know how much of CCC posts are taken up by posts regarding almost every >aspect of Crafty espically, those comparing it to commericals.. Good. People who are involved would be better moderators if you ask me. The 3 people that are mention here are all level headed people. All 3 have a firm grasp on logic, and in all 3 cases, there are very few holes in their arguments and discussions (ok, sure, there's always some, but few). All this makes them very well suited to moderate if you ask me. But the chances of all 3 actually being elected are actually slim. Maybe, but figure that one to three of them will be elected. What does Los Vegas say? Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.