Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 13:08:31 08/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
>SSDF uses auto232. I am afraid that auto232 under winboard (by Remi) is still >not very well known. >IMO, crafty will profit in the chessbase environment from the high quality book. > >Uli > >> >>pavel The results are not what bothers me. What bothers me, is they are using a version that had some serious bugs, and 17.08 came out very quickly after 17.07 to correct this... If they want to use a version close to 17.07, then use 17.08. Atleast there will be more realistic results. Crafty is definately higher rated than the current SSDF list states. And I doubt many will argue with that fact. As for Crafty not using the Winboard environment, that is actually a good thing. Under ChessBase GUI, it is getting a well designed book to use. Crafty's book is good, but most times very speculative. The Crafty 16.xx series book, was by far better than the 17.xx series. Then again Uli, would you want the SSDF testing a version of Comet that had serious bugs in it? I don't think you would, so why should another author have to take the same sort of results?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.