Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:08:27 08/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2002 at 03:32:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On August 20, 2002 at 18:24:43, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>Nonsense, what would be the point, anyone could toss together 100 pages in two >>weeks, why would you need a year for that? > >If you hadn't constantly ignored the arguments presented, while distributing >your (by now) rateher tiresome subjective views handsomely in this thread, you >would know the requirements and the differences. The angle in theoretical >comparative research is the bit where you argue/prove why you've chosen to >include/preclude certain papers/articles/books. That is by no means simple. In >general that would require more sources than a narrow experimentally based >thesis. The difference between mastering the knowledge of the field in general >and in particular. Both are accepted. > >In short. A comparative study with implementation and data, which is how I >interpret the thesis in question, is sufficient. Even in the intellectually >gifted kingdom of Denmark *cough*. Well Mogens, it takes two to make it tiresome, all I can say is you won't find supervisor anywhere around here that will let you slide with a compendium. That is a fact. -S. > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.