Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ruffian is here - Make your move Bob Hyatt!

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 08:44:48 09/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 23, 2002 at 11:26:45, Robert Hyatt wrote:

Hi Bob,

>Frank:
>Didn't you take this _same_ position about both Voyager and Le Petite?

No, all what you have written in the past to Voyager and LaPetite is to 100%
right!!

My opinion was not right. But I am not a programmer and I have not see it. Look,
we spent hours of time for test Voyager and I am very disappointed about
Gabriele Müller (also Prof. Djordje Vidanovic and other persons).

In this case I have not see that Voyager, LaPetite, LaGrande is Crafty.
But the programmer of Voyager work on an own new learning mode (I know that).
Bionic also, the programmer from Bionic have own code in his program and have
written (after my information) that he used code from Crafty. I believe in
Bionic cases a little misunderstanding. The Bionic programmer give maybe to late
this information and thinking all is free and he must not asked.

But clear is for me, after Pete Galati have sent me string files that Voyager
and Co. is Crafty.

>It
>is ok to be "trusting" of everything around you if you want to be.  But it is
>_also_ ok for others to be less trusting, after having seen misbehavior dozens
>of times in the past 30 years...
>
>In the case of the two programs above, you were certain that they were "new"
>programs and that the authors could be trusted.  Until I posted absolute proof
>here that they were simple copies with a few names changed to protect the
>guilty.
>
>fool me once, shame on you.
>
>fool me twice, shame on _me_.
>
>As the saying goes.
>
>I don't intend to be "fooled" again...

I have 100% the same opinion.
I can not more do as to sorry for my Voyager and LaPetite messages for 3 years.
I have delete the program from my older webpages minutes later as I saw the
string files. We have mailed in this time. The same for Siboney (with source
code from Pepito).

I understand your messages here.

I think, all is possible and Ruffian is a little sensation.
But after the things from the past are the rumors OK. I believe also the Ruffian
author can understand this.

Furhtermore, you have not say Ruffian is a crafty clone.
You have added clear messages here, also easy to understand for me and my bad
English.

Best
Frank



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.