Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:50:53 10/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2004 at 14:23:48, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On October 20, 2004 at 13:37:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On October 20, 2004 at 11:08:45, emerson tan wrote: >> >>>Who are the players of a team you will choose that will play against the team of >>>computers consist of hydra, shredder, fritz, junior. hiarcs, rebel and chess >>>tiger? >>> >>> >>>I would choose, kramnik, leko, anand, karpov, seirawan, ulf andersson and im >>>still looking for the 7th player. I choose them because of their style that >>>computers will have a hard time. karpov, seirawan and ulf andersson are "old" >>>and they may easily get a blunder and lose energy, that's the drawback. Maybe >>>bareev, dreev, gelfand who is solid, vallejo pons, very solid, kasparov cannot >>>win against him. >>> >>> >>>Who are the other players you would nominate? >> >> >> Who is still interested in such matches? > >Me. But why do you say that? Because humans play with the "wrong way" or because >the inevitable loss of human is coming with a huge speed? Hi George I pressed too fast the sent button -:) But what I wanted to say is that I am not interested in further matches unless top GM's have learnt how to play vs computer programs. I have pity on GM's not doing this way as too much respectless people are loughing at the unlucky GM's who of course do understand chess many times better than any computer program. It's still my opinion that computers would hardly ever win a game (even vs 2200 Elo players) if humans would follow a do-nothing-but-do-it-well-strategy. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.