Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:36:39 10/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2000 at 01:53:27, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 22:50:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 09, 2000 at 14:01:32, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On October 09, 2000 at 10:37:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On October 09, 2000 at 03:28:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 08, 2000 at 22:57:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>There was absolute no need for the moderators to interfere. Remember the >>>>>>>occasion when you was subject to moderation? How did it feel? That's what >>>>>>>you are doing each time you interfere so it better should be big when you >>>>>>>decide to speak as a moderator using your power, because that is the >>>>>>>position you have as an elected moderator. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>NOBODY interfered. >>>>> >>>>>Yes you did. >>>>> >>>>>When I asked you the question if you were talking as CCC member or >>>>>as CCC moderator you said the latter. >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>> >>>> >>>>Please. It seems definitions are very _loose_ today. Go look up "interfere" >>>>and then tell me how I interefered in any of the chessmaster threads, in any >>>>way or fashion. I _asked_ the poster to choose more suitable subject lines. >>>>I didn't prevent him from posting _anything_. I didn't remove _anything_. >>>>I didn't threaten to remove _anything_. I didn't threaten any kind of action >>>>at _all_. >>> >>> >>>>So exactly how did I interfere? >>> >>> >>>BH wrote: >>>>>>and when the threads here also have complaints about the subjects. I don't >>>>>>mind the chessmaster threads, as I said during moderator elections. But I >>>>>>don't like "world cup underway". A person can't hold a "world cup" event. >>> >>>ES: >>>>>Fine with me as long as you say that as a CCC member. >>> >>>BH: >>>>I believe that this falls under the moderator job description. >>> >>> >>>Here for instance you admitted that your criticism to a header description >>>was done in the role as moderator and not as being a CCC member. It is a >>>warning to all CCC members. >>> >>>Do we need this? I don't think so. Which is and was my whole and only point. >>> >>>Ed > > >>Why would it matter whether it was done as a member, a moderator, or by the >>president of the United States? > >That we have discussed in length by now. Time to stop. > > >>Did you go to school? >> >>College? >> >>If you did, how on earth did you respond when a teacher criticized your writing >>style and suggested you do some things differently? That's all this was. > >A teacher teaches children. > >Ed > > Can we stop with the one-liners that have no thought behind them? I am teaching a class right now where 1/2 of the students are > 30 years old. Are _they_ children? I distinctly said "college". IE beyond grade 12. I often have one or two students in class that are _older_ than I am, this being a graduate/Ph.D. program as well as an undergraduate program. BTW, I don't call _anyone_ 19 years old or more a "child". They are "adults". Unless we are sending children off to fight wars. And letting children vote. > >>A >>critical remark about the subject not agreeing with the body of the post. Any >>writing teacher would complain if the title of a paper had _nothing_ to do with >>the content. Or if the title was greatly misleading... >> >>I didn't even threaten to "flunk" him. :) Just asked him to be more >>reasonable in choosing the subject. >> >>That certainly fits within the definition of "moderator". Again from my >>Webster's...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.