Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 08:26:47 11/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
>I think on a AMD K6-2 450 MHz is the rating from the SSDF OK, but with the next >games is the rating higher, I am sure. The AMD processor is not the best >processor for Gandalf 4.32f ! > >Best >Frank Not only that, but in my testing, Gandalf 4.32e is much stronger than Gandalf 4.32f. In 5 min games. Total games 85: Gandalf 4.32e: +56 =12 -17 Gandalf 4.32f: =17 =12 -56 In 15 min games. Total games 75: Gandalf 4.32e: +47 =13 -15 Gandalf 4.32f: +15 =13 -47 In 40 min games. Total games 50: Gandalf 4.32e: +26 =15 -9 Gandalf 4.32f: +9 =15 -26 In 40/40 games. Total games 60: Gandalf 4.32e: +43 =8 -9 Gandalf 4.32f: +9 =8 -43 Each series was started with a new book. Both programs on a PIII 500, 256 megs ram. 56 meg hash tables for both. Here is the performance of white/black via elo_stat: White Perf. : 49.4 % Black Perf. : 50.6 % Gandalf 4.32e was the strongest version, and should have been the commercially released version. Here is a set of games in the Fritz interface: These were 40/40 games: Total 150. Gandalf 4.32e: +87 =23 -40 Fritz 6a: +40 =23 -87 These were 40/40 games. Total games 150. Gandalf 4.32f: +53 =47 -50 Fritz 6a: +50 =47 -53 You can see the "e" version destroyed Fritz 6a, and actually was the strongest version over ICS play as well. My question is why wasn't it the commercial version?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.