Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 03:55:26 11/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 1999 at 05:33:40, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 06, 1999 at 17:52:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >A TRAP that didn't work well since Tiger could draw, so there is no trap. When you have black - a draw is a good result. never heard about ? >But very interesting this new excuse, you never used that. :-) ANY chess player knows this. the chances to win a black game are lower. >So the Netherlands Ch doesn't fit to your superior tiger results, right? do they use the same machines? Do they play 20 games against ONE opponent like i am playing ? do they play 40/120 ? No. No. No. > Where >is it Tiger crushing all opponents? tiger has not lost a game. again : if you look into the games you see the opening decisions were not very helpful. you will see in a few months, tiger is the strongest program. i know you don't like this. but you cannot change facts. it will take you time. because you don't have played those many games i have seen with tiger. but you will find out. and than you will understand. do you believe a program that kills fritz6 +8 =7 -3 is weak ? >AFAIK QUEST is the engine within Fritz6 so the only difference is the GUI. aha. have you ever spoken with frans about this ? we should maybe wait. until people from netherlands report it to us. also you can find out by replaying the games. when YOUR fritz6 replays all the moves... when. >You can force any opponent to play a line you want to, the art is to run into a >line you can handle better. right. and this is the job of the operator. look into the games before you construct the legend of the weak tiger and the strong fritz and the king. just replay the games and you see... i do have cm6 here. i can play games between tiger12 and cm6.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.