Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 03:05:02 08/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 1998 at 20:47:49, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 12, 1998 at 20:21:54, Mark Young wrote: > >>I'm glad you see it my way. > >Your way is not my way. Your hear said is not mine. I have a completely >different target to do computerchess than you have. > >> If you have a problem with what happend then its >>your own fault. > >Humans make "faults". > >> You are the one that made the claim here. > >And claiming something that somebody said me, makes me a liar? Of course not. Forgetful or mistaken are better words. Because you did forget to mention that Fritz 5 ran on a 2X slower machine in its match against Rebel 10. You also forgot to mention that in this match Fritz 5 tied with Rebel 10, stating instead that Fritz lost. But mistakes are not lies. Now for interpretation of data. If losing makes Fritz 5 much weaker on even machines (???), then winning when F5 ran on a 2x slower machine would mean... But we know you are against bean counters and simplistic logic. Forget facts. Only simple minds care about them. >>If you were unsure of >>your facts then you should have said nothing. > >I wasn't unsure. I do believe what moritz says. You can trust him... > >>Instead you could not wait to >>trash fritz one more time falsely. > >As i said: there is no need to trash fritz. This is redundant. Fritz IS trash. >No need to repeat tautologically ! Then don’t... Ad libitum, ad nauseam, ad infinitum. Are you talking about Fritz 5 as a program or as an engine? As a program, you can always play with other available and high quality engines, if Fritz itself doesn’t amuse you. And then you would still have the wonderful features, the access to the best databases there are. Etc. Etc. Etc. Surely you refer to the engine. For a forgetful person it would be worth to remember all results posted before about Fritz 5 by Mark, Moritz, myself, the SSDF... Also about excellent results obtained by Fritz 5 in strong human tournaments. Fritz 5 did very well in all those, as we all remember. Will your tournament be the first one where Fritz will score poorly? So you don’t care for Fritz 5 as an engine. Most interesting. But trash? Then what are all the others that systematically score less well than Fritz 5? >> This is your own fault not Moritz or mine. > >Fault is it to call somebody a liar in public/here, just for nothing. >You need this. Do it. But stand the consequences. I find your sudden concern for netiquette touching. Three members of the now dissolved group of CCC founders complained to moderators about your personal insults here in the past. One of them, as moderator, gave you a telephone call asking you to put an end to your insulting campaign against Chessbase and against some CCC posters. From “Marlboro man” to “bean counters”, with other charming epithets in between, remember? Surely not, otherwise you wouldn't try to apply to others the rules you didn't follow. But now that you see the light and the need to avoid personal attacks, I couldn’t agree more with you. And then again I think Mark was wrong. A post devoid of truth doesn’t necessarily make the poster a liar. Enrique >>And this time it came up and bit you in the ass. > >Richtig. Das scheint der richtige Ort für dich zu sein. > >> You set the standard of truth >>here not Moritz or I. > >Du setzt überhaupt keinen Standard. Du unterbietest jeden.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.