Author: Sandi Ordinario
Date: 09:00:56 05/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2002 at 11:53:55, Jorge wrote: >On May 28, 2002 at 11:00:51, Sandi Ordinario wrote: > >>On May 28, 2002 at 09:45:17, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On May 28, 2002 at 09:19:30, Sandi Ordinario wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Mustafa et al, >>>>Last week I wrote about CM on Pentium 3 beating Fritz on Pentium 4 whether >>>>playing White or Black. I optimized Book options, reduced Hash to 2MB and turned >>>>off all options except notation for Fritz. Both software was on 10 sec/move. If >>>>I swapped them on the computers, CM8K run on Pentium 4 would beat Fritz on less >>>>than 40 moves very brilliantly (sacrifices and all). I don't know what to do. I >>>>hope it is not all hype for Fritz. >>>> >>>>Then I tried 20sec/move same settings but I raised Fritz's Hash to 4MB on the >>>>Pentium 4 as white. It was able to draw for the first time CM8000 after 80 >>>>moves. Perhaps Fritz is better with more thinking time, that is with higher Hash >>>>setting. What do you think? I think you're trolling! >>>>Sandi >>> >>>http://w1.859.telia.com/%7Eu85924109/ssdf/list.htm >>> >>>TM >> >>Hi TM >>I looked at the results of the computer tournament and immediately I noticed >>that the top dozen or so were running on AMD Athlon at 1.2GHz but CM and all the >>rest of the runner-ups were on 450MHz. This is unfair. Why does not someone run >>them at the same computer type and speed like I am doing? Perhaps they will get >>a surprise of their life. >>Sandi > > >I agree! If this is the case, other variables should be the same or at least as >close as the same as possible. > >regards, >jorge Hi Jorge! I am glad you agree with my observations. Perhaps computer software performance should be better regulated. Thanks for your view. Sandi
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.