Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: Current status

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 13:22:30 04/09/00

On April 09, 2000 at 15:52:39, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On April 08, 2000 at 20:09:38, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On April 08, 2000 at 19:49:37, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>
>>>"Ritter Rost" happens to be two German words meaning "Knight Rust." I don't know
>>>the significance of this, but I doubt it's a "real" name.
>>>
>>>I've sent him e-mail asking him to confirm the legality of his posts, and I've
>>>posted below asking him to back up his (?) accusations with some evidence.
>>>
>>>Right now, I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that the posts
>>>are legal and that he can present such evidence.
>>>
>>>If the posts are actually illegal, I will delete the threads.
>>>
>>>If the accusations aren't validated, I will ask that people stop posting to the
>>>threads.
>>>
>>>-Tom
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I have no idea who this person are, but I'm very familiar with the e-mail, and I
>>don't liked it.
>>
>>Bertil
>
>
>I don't understand: are you saying that the SSDF really received this email from
>Ossi Weiner?
>
>
>    Christophe
Hi!

Yes I and Thoralf received it and we don't liked it.
I guarantee that I or Thoralf Carlsson haven't published it.

Bertil

Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Christophe Theron 17:10:11 04/09/00
- Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Heiner Marxen 08:14:51 04/10/00
- Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 19:46:29 04/09/00
  - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Bruce Moreland 11:03:53 04/10/00
    - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 18:00:10 04/10/00
      - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Dave Gomboc 21:32:04 04/10/00
        
        Re: Thankyou (NT) Pete Galati 22:38:51 04/10/00
        
        Moderation: slow to remove post(s) Dave Gomboc 16:18:23 04/11/00
      - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Pete Galati 21:16:49 04/10/00
  - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 23:48:55 04/09/00
    - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 06:23:17 04/10/00
      - Moderation: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake KarinsDad 11:48:26 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Pete Galati 12:46:36 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Dann Corbit 14:47:50 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Robert Hyatt 17:48:03 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Pete Galati 15:13:23 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Dann Corbit 15:51:43 04/10/00
        
        Re: Moderation: Question for Steven Schwartz Pete Galati 16:33:24 04/10/00
      - Moderation: Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Andrew Williams 07:54:09 04/10/00
      - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 07:20:41 04/10/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 13:09:05 04/10/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 13:43:05 04/10/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 17:43:36 04/10/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 01:58:45 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 06:54:00 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 11:00:13 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Bertil Eklund 14:30:10 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Dave Gomboc 08:50:02 04/12/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 14:48:23 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 14:02:49 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 14:45:59 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 19:09:06 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 21:24:34 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 07:40:19 04/12/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 09:41:18 04/12/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Bruce Moreland 10:28:40 04/12/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Mogens Larsen 20:05:59 04/11/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Dan Ellwein 04:10:12 04/12/00
        
        Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Tom Kerrigan 10:05:39 04/12/00
        
        Now it's clear that this horse has been beaten to death. KarinsDad 11:57:16 04/12/00
- Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Pete Galati 19:37:31 04/09/00
  - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Ed Schröder 23:35:10 04/09/00
    - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Robert Hyatt 06:37:28 04/10/00
      - Re: Now it's clear that Ritter Rost's post is not a fake Jason Williamson 10:06:58 04/11/00

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.