Author: Pete Galati
Date: 16:57:22 08/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2000 at 19:23:32, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Surely you have noted how much coincidental are the moderations philosophies of >the candidates. With maybe one exception -and perhaps is just a matter of >wording- we will face a difficult choice between all of them, except for reasons >of friendship or simpathy. In doctrine they are all almost equal. I am glad it >is so because that coincidence has been produced, mostly, around tolerance. If >you take a look at what moderators profesed two or three elections ago, you will >see a great difference. Off topic post are by now universally accepted -just in >a degree, but of course always its number will be just a matter of "degree" >anyway- and in general the attitude of everybody seems to me more friendly and >less harsh and threatening. Probably this is a signal of the maduration of the >entire site. We know each other a lot better, difficult guys were executed long >ago -maybe not always with reason, but the result is more peace, no doubt- and >so we are almost arriving to a point when will need to elect a non-moderator >guy, a profesional warmonger to enliven this place. Just a joke... >Fernando I read through them (there's one still missing) and I wrote down 5 names that most reflected my viewpoints on how things should be moderated. If I had to vote in 5 minutes, I allready know which 2 cross off the list and which 3 I'd I'd vote for. It's hard to say if I'll have the same opinion when I do need to vote. Probably. Pete
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.