Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:33:23 09/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 19:25:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 26, 2001 at 19:20:43, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>What is wrong with this idea? > >Could you elaborate a bit more? I'm not sure I really 'got' >what you were asking. Let's make a simple example with a simpler, hypothetical game, where each move has three choices: Here I am thinking about what to do at A, and I can choose B, C, D. Suppose I choose B and (the choices after B) E,F,G searched about the same, then I just analyze B. But suppose that E looked really good and F & G were both dogs -- then I don't analyze B, I switch instead to E and analyze that. I don't know if I am making myself clear. It seems a good picture in my head but it does not seem to come out very well.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.