Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Programmers -- take note: M. N. J. van Kervinck's Master's Thesis

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 11:07:08 08/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 20, 2002 at 10:54:20, Sune Fischer wrote:

>Half the programmers here should get a Ph.D if this is the standard for a
>masters.

As Marc Boulé pointed out in another post, a master's thesis doesn't require any
new material. A PhD requires completely original work. I think people are mixing
up the requirements and thinking it all has to be new material. That's just one
thing I've noticed in reading all of the replies. I've never written a master's
thesis, or read very many, so I can't personally say whether this is a good one
or not.

I enjoyed it though, even if I already knew most of it. I think regardless of
whether or not it's a good thesis, it is a good paper. In reading it I got many
new ideas (not directly from the paper, but it made me think of new ideas). I
think it is similar to how they recommend that you re-read a chess book after
every 200 point ELO improvement, because you will understand things you didn't
pick up on before.

Anyway, according to the requirements put forth by Marc Boulé in his response,
this sounds like a master's thesis to me, but not a PhD thesis.

Russell



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.