Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 08:44:32 10/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2004 at 10:58:41, Graham Laight wrote: >So - the human players at Bilbao (Ruslan Ponomariov, Véselin Topálov and Sergey >Karjakin) were simply not sufficiently well motivated, then? > >-g Frankly looking at the way the humans played, there was certainly room for vast improvement. They played the computers as if they were playing humans. That is the wrong thing to do. If you look at most games, they were of high "tactic" play. This is _exactly_ the strength of the computers. In the one game where the human played positionally, he made the computer look like a complete patzer. It was unfortunate that it was Junior, but it could have _easily_ been any other program there. Put Anand in there instead of Topalov, and the results would have been much different. The humans that played are not experienced computer players. I don't even think one of them has attended an AEGEON event (I could be wrong about this). In the Karjakin - Junior game, Karjakin played _excellent_ anti-computer chess. On ICC there are a few GM's that in longer games, just make the machines look stupid. It is almost insane how easily they win. There is also an IM on ICC named IgorIvanov. He plays my computer all the time (Shredder 8), and even in a blitz game (5 3), he can win _easily_. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.