Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:34:40 05/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
>>You are absulutely right. >>It is obvious that humans already solved chess so they know if a move is a >>blunder or not a blunder so you can be sure that all the question marks are >>correct. >> >>It is also obvious that the number of mistakes is what decides the game so if >>your opponent did 2 mistakes you can let yourself to do one mistake like letting >>him to force mate and you are not going to lose. >> >>:_( >> >>Uri > >You know, Uri, I have never seen you do anything but post how other people are >wrong (never with any reasons of course). Many other people have noticed your >unending flood of negativity. It is difficult to consider this post as anything >other than a flame. It appears I am going to have to take off the kid gloves >and dispose of you. Isn't it natural to only post if you disagree? Anyway, I suspect Uri has a point. It's not unusual for computers to play "unatural" moves, just think of the Hedgehog Junior played against Kasparov. All the time the GM's were saying how strange Junior's moves were, how "it showed no understanding of the position" blah blah blah. So please explain why Kasparov suddenly had to fight for a draw after 10 questionmark moves from Junior! -S.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.