Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 18:44:59 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 16:09:57, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 15:48:44, John Warfield wrote: > >>On January 26, 2000 at 14:41:41, Albert Silver wrote: > >>>My, how tempers rise. Thing is, in the posts you mentioned, Chris poked first. >>>Sure, Bob usually "rises to the occasion", but he had answered the question with >>>a fact, and then speculation. First he said that "In Hsu's case, he can't >>>_really_ give an exact nps, because the hardware processors don't count nodes." >>>and then tried to explain how he thought the number was reached. Chris ignored >>>this and made it clear he thought Bob didn't know what he was talking about. >>>Since some of the explanation contained "Hsu said" this sounds a little unjust, >>>and Bob poked back. Nothing too serious. Just egos bumping into each other, but >>>hardly justifying leaving altogether. I hope Chris will cool off and reconsider. > >> Come on Albert!, I like you and everything but I can't help but notice that >>you seem to take hyatt's side on practically every issue. I can't see Chris as >>provoking anything, as he is one of the most mellowest people I have heard here. > >Albert Silver is talking about the thread. You are talking about personalities. > Go look at the thread and reach your own conclusion. > >I will save you some time: > >http://www.icdchess.com/ccc/message.html?91972 > >bruce Ah now I see after logging on 12 hours later what all these threads about Chris and bob are about. Bob was a bit harsh (but nothing major), and Chris responded as anyone would. But I think a chill pill should be taken by both. But on the whole an over reaction of both sides. I had a small argument with bob where I was attacking Hsu about the DB chip and I finally said to bob that this is just my opinion on what I have heard about all this. He said yes an opinion, just an uninformed one. And a few other remarks, but I just smailed and left it at that. I think sometimes bob brings some teaching comments into his remarks, and people might feel they are being preached too. But I do not really bother about things like this. I just fell most of the attacks on bob are from people who do it for the hell of it. Anyone who has a public statue in this world are prone to attacks. Bob has done allot in computer chess and people get their jolly's off attacking anyone well know.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.