Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:45:04 12/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2002 at 09:59:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 10, 2002 at 09:20:02, Nicolas GUIBERT wrote: > >>>hello, the size of the evaluation of napoleon is only limited by the >>>time i spent to it. I have 40 pages of evaluation patterns and ideas >>>from Marcel to the left of this keyboard. For this tournament i could >>>only implemet page 1 and 2. So i added 40 new patterns/bugfixes to >>>the evaluation for last tournament the 2 evenings before the blitz >>>tournament. >> >>Good luck then for these 40 pages. I also have a long, long, long, never-ending, >>to-do list... :o))) >> >>>In C code expressed it is in total let me check: >>> >>>4000 source code lines. >>> >>>That ain't much IMHO, knowing i have a multiple of that in DIEP. >> >>How much in Diep ? >>4000 is indeed way insufficient. >> >>>But it is probably more than most draughts programs (and way more >>>than most chess programs). >> >>Really ? How much do you think it is for other top level chess programs ? > >He talked only about most program and not about most top program. i don't know about buggy (Nicolas plays draughts at the same level that i play chess) but when compared to the rest for sure yes. >The latest version of movei(that is not freeware) is not a top program but I >believe that it is better than most chess programs(there are a lot of free chess >programs and it is hard to know if it is better than most of the chess programs >because the question is what is the level of the private programs) > >It has only about 200 lines of C codes that are used for evaluation. >I am interested more in search improvements then in evaluation improvements. >Uri Then you will of course never make it to the top. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.