Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:49:54 06/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 1999 at 12:38:33, blass uri wrote: >>when you start with 4 programs, ONE program has to be in a good place. >Fritz did not start with 4 programs. >They started with only one program. >It used 4 processors but it is not 4 programs. >other programs also used more than one processor and most of them did not do >good result. ChessBase started with Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs and Nimzo. Hiarcs was the strongest. >Diep also used 4 processors and it did not help it. >Zugzwang and P.conners had better hardware and it did not help them. Exactly. 4x nothing = nothing. >You also said that using 4 proccesors can also make fritz see draws faster >but I did not see draws for fritz only wins and losses. you have not seen the score of each position, don't you ? I was there. I have it on video. draw-score , draw-score, draw-score. As if chess is draw ! :-)) >It is not clear to me if CStal is more intelligent >In the game that you posted here of Cstal against Fritz the draw scores of Fritz >were more correct than the unrealistic scores of Cstal. :-))) Aha. the draw scores are realistic !! :-))) if a program only evaluates draw over draw-score, and loses (like fritz in paris against ferret e.g.) what is the realistic part of the score ?? Ferret was 0.43 up and fritz was 0.00 ! What was realistic of this evaluation? What was fritz evaluating ? Its chances to win the championship? >The final position is a draw by tablebases. >Fritz showed in this position -8.xx score against itself but it is only because >of the fact that Fritz does not use tablebases. oh - what a pity :-))) the poor poor fritz. :-))) >Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.