Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:05:17 05/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2000 at 14:48:31, Chessfun wrote: I'm not going to disappoint you when it comes to making comments on your posts. >Sorry, but you are wrong. The conditions are/were as clinical >as possible. I dare say not much difference between what >I was doing and how the SSDF test. The conditions were not that bad, and probably much better than any test I've ever done, but then again it's only a bit of chess fun for me and it could have been a lot better. Since the tests were so clinical, how come you haven't got _any_ comparable data whatsoever? Comparing your own test to the ones made by SSDF, reveals ignorance concerning the work effort invested by the members of the SSDF, which I find distasteful. Like your test, your sense of proportion needs to be calibrated correctly. Sincerely, Mogens Chr. Larsen
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.